Trust & mistrust

An insight from the work of behavioural economist/neuroscientist Paul Zak on levels of oxytocin in our blood stream: Reciprocity is more likely for those with high levels of oxytocin.  And most interesting finding: 5% of people will never reciprocate in trust experiments.  He calls those lacking in trust to their fellow humans bastards 🙂  I think this needs to be qualified.  And of course put into context of what trust is good for.

The implication of this claim for SNA could be that; a. some social actors are genetically predisposed to be isolates & b. that social interaction is not only determined by feelings of trust but driven by need & opportunity.  i.e the distribution of trust is not the only force driving social interaction.  And of course that personal social capital can be a reputational resource that can affect the probability of reciprocation, even if an actor is generally mistrusting of others and seeking to exploit the reciprocation of others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s