Are we tied to our historical ancestors?
A brilliant book by Edith Hall on Introducing the Ancient Greeks is a great source on current archeological research and unique in its perspective. She frames the ancient Hellenes as inquisitive and restless seafarers, who were “argumentative, inspirational, beauty-loving, and hedonistic”. By comparison, lets examine a caricature of Greeks in their “ideal” modern moment. The year is 2004, the Olympics are held in Athens, and national pride and general euphoria are in abundance. So, inquisitiveness has transformed to a sedentary life; argumentativeness has transformed to belligerence; beauty is neither in evidence nor in production; while hedonism lacks refinement and is exhausted on shows of conspicuous consumption. Of all that was “good”, being inspirational is the only trait that is maybe still in evidence. The intervening hangover and wanton financial destruction since 2007 complicates the picture – and makes any further comparisons unfair to contemporaries.
Edith Hall’s book may be particularly instructive for those that claim historical ties to the Hellenes. Ancient democracy was not settled nor was it unique to city-states, like Athens. Institutions were in constant flux and political ideas contested. Even the most fundamental political principles, such as isonomia (equality under law) had to be continuously defended and redefined. It is also fascinating how, at the time of decay, the original concepts were reinterpreted and diluted by dynastic powers such as the Ptolemies in Egypt and the Romans. It is also instructive to assess how their ideas were eventually subverted and undermined by a messianic sect that found in the Hellenic world a fertile ground to proselytize, dominate and eventually negate.
An idea attributed to Isocrates deserves a special mention: what does it mean to be an educated person? “Greeks…were not united by blood but by a frame of mind (dianoia) which could only be acquired through education in Greek culture (paideusis) not by some process of nature” (Hill, 2015:233). So, maybe paideusis can lead us beyond appreciation to understanding and remains therefore the only meaningful tie to the ancients.
I am following my own advice by now reading a book on why Homer still matters by Adam Nicolson which looks trully fascinating – Tom, thanks for the recommendation.
Politics & Networks 
Thanks for the mention!
I REALLY like the Nicholson book – soooo interesting and such an great angle. Amazing to have such a fresh interpretation from an Englishman so recently.
That Troy was a clash of cultures ; the strong hero (achilles etc) vs community (Trojans) ; an invasion of warring nations (individuals) into a settled familial culture.
I really hadn’t thought that Odysseus always wanted to be inland (Almost Mongolian) -The sea was a dangerous place and peace was to be found where ‘the oar would be mistaken for the winnowing fan’
_
I’m still trying to write a book about ‘the leadership lessons of Odysseus’ – But there’s a lot of revenge in there and ‘foxiness’ which I would describe as selfish or self serving. Not to mention he is in Dante’s 13 worst circle of hell – for betraying… (Trojan horse).
but I love Nicholsons reflection that after the escape from Scylla ‘he rowed on’… Then again I struggle with the concept of betraying his team (albeit for 50% survival with Scylla rather than 100% death with Charybdis…) Is this the same as a CEO closing a loss making division to save the company?
________
Hope all swell with you in Europeland wherever you are (!)
I look forward to discussing ‘Why Homer Still Matters’ with you in future… – because he really does and blind or not, two people or one – ‘he’ has saved me many times
I’m rowing on.
Tom
Salthouse & Peppermongers Office: 01292 292018 Tom Mobile : 07734240779 North Harbour, Ayr KA8 8AE
This e-mail message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is prohibited. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by e-mail is deemed to have accepted these risks. Company Name is not responsible for errors or omissions in this message and denies any responsibility for any damage arising from the use of e-mail. Any opinion and other statement contained in this message and any attachment are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
>